Blog

Jefferson County Foundation asks WV EQB to reopen Rockwool Construction Stormwater Permit appeal after bombshell emails discovered from DEP

It seems that the WV Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) permit review process has been tainted by political pressure disregarding the environmental impact of Rockwool’s factory construction in Jefferson County. In an email thread that started on January 14, 2020, Yogesh Patel, Assistant Director of the Water and Waste Management division and supervisor of the permit writing team, tells the permit reviewer, Rick Adams, “Permit need (sic) to get it out on or before 01/24/2020.” Adams pushes back, stating, “I don’t think we can get permit out by Friday.” Patel responds moments later, “We have too (sic). Cabinet Secretary has committed, we do not have any choice.”   

This alarming discovery comes after the hearing in the Foundation’s appeal of Rockwool’s construction stormwater permit has been completed, after post-hearing briefs were filed, and while the case is awaiting a decision by the state Environmental Quality Board (EQB). At least four DEP employees, three of whom were deposed and testified under oath, failed to identify these facts. The emails were not produced as part of the Certified Record of the Construction Stormwater Appeal 20-02-EQB. Needless to say, had this email been produced when it should have been during the case proceedings, the Foundation would have had the chance to dig further into the apparent political pressure on DEP staff to issue Rockwool’s permit.  

In light of the emails that have just been discovered, on June 10, 2021 attorneys for the Foundation filed a motion before the EQB asking for reopening of the record and proceedings in the Construction Stormwater Permit Appeal, stating that “[i]f the DEP is allowed to selectively and without consequences withhold documents from the Certified Record, the process is without credibility. Presumably that is why the Legislature set as the first requirement after an appeal is filed in an environmental case, the production [of] a full and complete record.” The motion continues, “The disclosure of political influence on the permit review process, apparently exercised by the former Secretary, are matters of significant concern and information about same should properly have been put before the EQB and should have been available during the hearing process.”

On June 11, the EQB responded to the Motion and scheduled a hearing for June 24 requiring the parties to fully brief the issue before the hearing. Relatedly, the Foundation continues to work on its appeal of Rockwool’s Operational Stormwater Permit, 20-13-EQB (the email string that just came to light was recently produced by DEP during discovery for this appeal).

Watershed protection organizations from three states plead with the EPA to make West Virginia follow the Clean Water Act

A coalition of advocates has asked the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to investigate the actions of the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP), a state agency charged with protecting the environment but which appears to have allowed hundreds of polluters to operate in violation of the Clean Water Act, putting the surface and ground waters of the Chesapeake Bay and Ohio River Valley watersheds at risk. Documents recently obtained by Jefferson County Foundation show that the DEP advised the companies how it was going to assist them in avoiding operating without a permit, but never told the public.

[wpdm_package id=’2319′] [wpdm_package id=’2317′]

What Happened?

On January 10, 2019, the WVDEP submitted its draft of an updated Construction Stormwater General Permit (General Permit) to the EPA. On February 8, 2019, the day before it was to take effect, several industry groups appealed the new General Permit, and a stay was issued by the West Virginia Environmental Quality Board (EQB), the quasi-judicial review agency overseeing the Water and Waste Division of the WVDEP, allowing covered entities to continue to operate under an expired permit which dated back to 2012 and lacked the more-protective provisions that would have been in the 2019 General Permit. The EPA, in an October 31, 2019 specific objection letter, roundly rejected a new draft General Permit that the WVDEP submitted to it, citing backsliding, unenforceable ambiguity, and violations of the Clean Water Act. The EPA advised the WVDEP that the 2012 permit was expired and had been replaced, and directed the WVDEP not to allow any entity to continue operating under the 2012 permit or its conditions.

The WVDEP did not incorporate the suggested changes from the EPA and withdrew the draft revised permit from consideration. The WVDEP then took two even worse actions. First, the WVDEP allowed the issuance of General Permit registrations without valid applications or required materials. Second, in March of 2020, the agency issued 697 unilateral enforcement orders—almost entirely in one day—allowing entities to continue working under the 2012 General Permit. These irregularities are allowing the WVDEP to circumvent the normal permitting process and avoid complying with EPA’s requirements.

Meanwhile, the EPA has remained painfully silent for months, even though hundreds of entities in West Virginia are operating without a valid Clean Water Act permit. Jefferson County Foundation, along with watershed protection organizations from three states, have sent a formal letter of inquiry to the EPA pleading with the federal agency to exercise its oversight powers to find out why this has happened and take action to correct the situation urgently.

Lack of regulation and oversight could prove detrimental to the Ohio River Valley and Chesapeake Bay watersheds

These irregularities in process will lead to more sediment in the runoff from hundreds of construction sites entering the waterways. This can damage or destroy habitats, kill plants, and other vertebrate and non-vertebrate organisms within the water, and on the beds and banks of these waterways. Loss of vegetation can lead to further erosion and damage to the banks of waterways. Increased sediment can also affect water treatment plants and waterway recreation. The effects can further challenge rare or endangered native plant species and other vertebrate and invertebrate organisms.

In areas of karst hydrogeology, the groundwater is also at risk, affecting drinking water, and invertebrates that inhabit cave water. This includes the federally threatened Madison Cave Isopod. In the Chesapeake Bay watershed, the WVDEP’s cavalier approach means that entities are not following the newest standards to protect the bay. Clearly these actions by the WVDEP pose an unacceptable risk to water quality.

“Our goal is to make sure the WVDEP is doing their job in protecting the ground and surface water resources in West Virginia and beyond,” states Dr. Christine Wimer, president of Jefferson County Foundation. “We want the EPA to make sure that the DEP does it right; no more free passes for corporations and industries that are being allowed to skate by. Our water depends on it.”

The letter was co-signed by:

  • Jefferson County Foundation, Inc.
  • Aileen Curfman, Co-Chair, and Jim Kotcon, Conservation Chair, WV Chapter of Sierra Club
  • Linda Frame, President, West Virginia Environmental Council
  • Vivian Stockman, President, The Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition
  • Rosa P. Hance, Chair, Maryland Chapter Sierra Club
  • Paul Walker, Group Chair, Sierra Club Catoctin Group
  • Christopher G. Miller, President, The Piedmont Environmental Council
  • Brent Walls, Upper Potomac Riverkeeper
  • Gail Kohlhorst, Chair, Eastern Panhandle Sierra Club 
  • Larry Thomas, President, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy
  • Betty L. Wiley, President, Dunkard Creek Watershed Association, Inc.
  • Jeff Iliff, Advocacy Committee Chairperson, Warm Springs Watershed Association
  • Kevin Sellner, PhD, Senior Scholar (retired), Hood College, Center for Coastal & Watershed Studies
  • John Doyle, Member, West Virginia House of Delegates, 67th district
  • Sammi Brown, Member, West Virginia House of Delegates, 65th district